User talk:Ifuvuebeifhsuchd

September 2022

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that in this edit to Kateri Amman, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 04:23, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

I see that despite the fact that you were warned once already, you keep vandalising the Kateri Amman article without any citation. Do not do so again. You have been warned twice now. Chronikhiles (talk) 14:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have once again vandalised the article Kateri Amman without offering any citations. This is your third warning. I must ask you to stop your disruptive editing activity. If you vandalise the article for the fourth time, I will request that you be blocked. Chronikhiles (talk) 08:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You keep putting false information about ma that isn’t her story nor is she a malevolent being stop vandalizing her name Ifuvuebeifhsuchd (talk) 00:43, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have constantly vandalised details regarding the article, removed cited content, and engaged in POV pushing, all without a single source to back up your statements. Four times, not once. Your belief that "That isn't her story" is not a credible criterion to disruptively edit the article per WP policy. Chronikhiles (talk) 06:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You know nothing about mother Kateri you came out of nowhere posting misinformation saying this and that about her leave her page alone it’s none of your business Ifuvuebeifhsuchd (talk) 07:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have disruptively edited the article on Kateri Amman for the fourth time, despite repeated warnings. You have added no citations to support your claims, nor attempted to engage in a discussion per Wikipedia policy. Chronikhiles (talk) 06:23, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is my obligation to inform you that I have submitted your vandalism activity, which is currently being reviewed by administrators. Chronikhiles (talk) 06:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kaatteri and “Kateri” isn’t the same if you did some research you would know that kaatteri is a demon that haunts people this article is about mother Kateri she is a form of mahashakti that holds a similar name Ifuvuebeifhsuchd (talk) 07:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your bias aside, do you have any explanation for the removal of cited content? All the citations offered pertain to Kateri Amman, which you keep removing for your POV pushing. This counts as vandalism, which you have performed five times, with three editors opposing your edits. Your disruptive edits will not stay on the article. Period. Chronikhiles (talk) 11:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even know what vandalism means? It’s the act of damaging something what I’m doing is fixing the only one vandalizing is you stop reverting and pushing YOUR false narrative of ma just because you think she some type of demon doesn’t mean she is it’s not all about you Ifuvuebeifhsuchd (talk) 13:26, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said kaatteri is a demon Kateri is a form of shakti one quick search and you’ll find the difference leave Kateri alone Ifuvuebeifhsuchd (talk) 13:28, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may not use Wikipedia as sources for other Wikipedia articles. Refer to Wikipedia:Reliable Sources, familiarise yourself with them, and if you can find a reliable source for your assertations, you may add content. You have been reported to the admins, so if you disruptively edit further, I will be forced to report you again. Chronikhiles (talk) 04:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.DeCausa (talk) 09:18, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

chronikhiles Keeps vandalizing mother Kateri page he keeps spewing false information and adding thinga that are untrue to her page Ifuvuebeifhsuchd (talk) 13:48, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kateri Amman

@Ifuvuebeifhsuchd @Chronikhiles OK, you two have gotta compromise. This goddess does I believe have a benevolent aspect, chronikhiles - she's not totally like a demonic entity. Ifuvuebeifhsuchd - chronikhiles is right about the sources though, you cant source the wiki itself. If both of you guys agree to stop your edit warring that could get both you banned, I will come up with an objective picture representing both sides. Is this agreeable to both of you? Both of you should stop warring for the next few days while I do my research, and the page stays as the last cited version under chronikhiles until then. Please respond when you see this. 182.65.163.60 (talk) 04:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. A third, disinterested party is the best foot forward here. I hope that you will stay objective as you stated. Chronikhiles (talk) 05:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed I will stop editing as long as mother Kateri good side is shown as well Ifuvuebeifhsuchd (talk) 21:36, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]